Neil Baker Consulting and Coaching
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog

Flattened hierarchy = Increased empowerment?

7/30/2014

 
Picture
It is hard to even say the word "hierarchy" without evoking negative reactions, conjuring up images of stifling rules and procedures, excess management oversight which suffocates innovation, and demeaning top-down control.

This is why a popular notion has been to flatten hierarchies--i.e. to eliminate layers of management and broaden managers' span of responsibility (i.e. more staff reporting to each manager). The prediction is that this would save money, shift decision making downwards, increase empowerment, and enhance motivation.

Multiple studies run counter to expectations:
  1. In a study of over 300 large U.S. organizations over 15 years, on the whole flattening led to more involvement of high level executives in decision making. (1)
  2. In multiple industries where cuts of leadership and management have occurred, lower morale, more  turnover, and lower productivity have been reported.(2)
  3. A study in the airline industry found that team empowerment and coordination were enhanced by greater supervisory involvement, not cutting the number of supervisors. The critical factor appeared to be redefinition of the supervisory role to include assuring an environment of psychological safety with common understanding, facilitating learning via coaching, and identifying and helping to resolve conflict. Similar findings have emerged in healthcare. (3, 4)
  4. Some studies of the development of self-managed work teams have shown that teams with a closer relationship to supervising managers performed better. (5)
  5. A very large study by The Gallup Organization indicates the most important driver of     employee engagement is the quality of relationship with managers.(6)

Conclusion:  Flattening hierarchy may seem like an obvious solution to the ills of hierarchy. But, there are no easy recipes for success in business. The inter-relationships between number of layers of managers, ratio of managers to staff, and degree of empowerment are quite complicated.

Alternate theory: Changes in structure should come secondary to and only after an examination of the nature of relationships. A key question is whether all those with positional authority in the hierarchy are held responsible not just for whether work is done but also for quality of work environment. Changes primarily in structure are very unlikely to fix problems in this area and actually risk making things worse.

References
(1) Wulf, Julie The Flattened Firm-Not As Advertised Harvard Business School Working Paper, 12-087, April 9, 2012
(2)
Lorenz, Mary Employers Plan to Bring Back Middle Management Positions November 2011,

     http://thehiringsite.careerbuilder.com/2011/11/17/     
(3) Gittell, Jody Hoffer Paradox of Coordination and Control California Management Review, Spring 2000, Vol. 42, No. 3,
      101-117
(4) Gitell, Jody Hoffer Transforming Relationships for High Performance Stanford Business Books 2014
(5) Yeatts, Dale E. and Hyten, Cloyd High-Performing Self-Managed Work Teams Sage Publications 1998

(6) Buckingham, Marcus and Coffman, Curt First Break All the Rules The Gallup Organization, 1999

Having trouble motivating others?--a quick diagnostic

7/30/2014

 
Picture
First reflect:
(1) Check your theory of motivation.
"Having trouble motivating others?" is a trick question. You can't motivate others--at least if you want intrinsic motivation (defined as when people are fully willing and embrace a change out of interest and commitment).

Adults make their own choices. Trying to coax or arm-twist is likely to cause them to withdraw or just comply which leads to poor outcomes in complex tasks. Intrinsic motivation arises through partnership and collaboration. People have to "talk their way" toward taking on a change. The leader's task is to create the environment for collaborative relationships which can support robust conversations about change.

(2) Check your state of reactivity. If you are impatient or frustrated, you are likely to be in a reactive state and at risk for coaxing and arm-twisting. Find a way to get curious about others--use the five factors listed below to guide your questions. Find your way to trusting and respecting different decision-making processes.

(3) Check the context and state of relationships.
For example, if you have previously fallen into pressuring others to change, it will take time to build trust as you shift to a collaborative approach. What other factors in the environment are influencing consideration of a particular change?

After reflection:
(4) Ask others questions to explore five factors for engagement with intrinsic motivation.
Understanding:

  • What is your understanding of the change?
  • How would you describe it to someone else?
Importance:
  • What is most important/meaningful for you at work? What makes you most enthusiastic about your work? (Ask "why" five times.)
  • How could the change we are working on benefit what is most important to you?
  • What is at risk for you if it does not go well? What are your concerns?
Choice:
  • Is there a specific action which would be a good place for you to start?
  • How do you want to participate in design and implementation?
Confidence:
  • How confident are you that we can mitigate the risks of this change for you?
  • How could we do that? What might you do?
  • How confident are you that you can be successful?
  • What are barriers?
  • Is there a barrier that is most important to work on right now?
  • What action might you test right now?
  • What actions might help from me?
  • What help and support do you need (e.g. coaching, consultation, training)?
Ongoing support:
  • How will we know if things are going well or not?
  • When will we meet next to check how things have gone?

When considering a change, motivation does not usually happen overnight. Even with the most charismatic, inspirational speech, you are lucky if you inspire no more than about 20% of people to action. Most people need ongoing conversations, individual consideration, and collaboration to take new directions.


Vulnerability, results, and leadership

7/23/2014

 
Picture
It may seem strange to link vulnerability with results because vulnerability is so often associated with weakness.

As defined by Brene Brown through her research, vulnerability is inherent in life--we cannot avoid "uncertainty, risk and emotional exposure." Our choice is how we "own and engage with our vulnerability." (1)


"To be vulnerable with others" means choosing to say what we really think and feel. It is about engaging in open, honest, and transparent communication. This means taking risks: of showing imperfection; of being wrong; of losing popularity; of losing status.

In organizations, an "open and trusting environment" has been linked with financial performance--
"fostering trust among managers and employees so that they are open to sharing information, providing and receiving honest feedback, and having difficult conversations." These are factors which enhance an organization's ability to "align, execute, and renew." (2)

Vulnerability does not mean "letting it all hang out" or emotional catharsis. (1) It demands appropriate openness that does not provoke defensiveness and withdrawal but builds partnership.
 
An organization will likely have a difficult time establishing group norms for safe conversation unless leaders "go first"--that is, unless leaders are active participants. Taking the lead in being vulnerable is hard to do but "the best cure for the fear of being burned is opening yourself up to being burned. Sometimes it's even okay to get burned because you realize it's not fatal." (3)

How safe is it to be vulnerable in your workplace? One indication is the way leaders talk. Listen for statements like: "I don't know; I need help; I am not sure but I feel we need to take the risk; It failed but I learned a lot; I made a mistake; I apologize; My idea may be completely off-base but I want your reactions; What can I do better next time?; I played a part in that." (1)

These statements may seem like weakness but this kind of vulnerability actually "sounds like truth and feels like courage...Truth and courage may not be comfortable but they are not weakness." (1)

References
(1) Brown, Brene Daring Greatly, Gotham Books, 2012
(2) De Smet, Aaron et al The Missing Link:
Connecting Organizational and Financial Performance McKinsey and
     Co., February 2007 (downloaded at McKinsey.com)
(3)
Lencioni, Patrick The Five Temptations of a CEO Jossey-Bass, 1998


Teamwork as perpetual feedback

7/21/2014

 
Picture
"The single most important skill to have in working through any problem is the ability to give constructive feedback. Why? Because most often problems are expressed as criticism of someone's actions." (1)

The stakes for feedback are higher on teams because "learning what several people expect of you is far more difficult than learning what one other person expects and needs." (2)  In effective teams, everyone helps each other to perform his/her role to meet expected outcomes--in Schein's words, "perpetual helping." But, feedback is the key mechanism for this helping. It is a means of constant course correction.

Because of the nature of personal exposure with feedback, the environment of trust on teams is essential. As Schein states, "What we think of as respect or trust is basically the feeling that you will not be humiliated or embarrassed even if your behavior deviates from the norm and is viewed as unhelpful. Instead you get task relevant information that allows you to figure out how to become more helpful in the effort to achieve goals." (2)

Helpful feedback is an art and skill which only develops with intentional practice. Practice gradually normalizes the discomfort of feedback.(3)  Over time, a feedback-rich culture can make feedback less a source of anticipated discomfort and more a source of desired learning. 


Key components of productive feedback include (from references 1 and 2):
(a) prior setting of team norms and work process specifications
(b) specific, concrete, behavioral descriptions related to achieving goals (not good vs. bad)
(c) avoidance of labels, generalizations, and characterizations (e.g. "You are lazy.")
(d)
using "I" statements and owning feedback as perceptions as opposed to "Truth"
(e) asking for the other person's perception in response
(f) stating genuine positive regard along with the feedback wherever appropriate


References
(1) Schein, Edgar Helping: How to Offer, Give, and Receive Help Berrewtt-Koehler Publishers,Inc., 2009
(2) Scholtes, Peter R. et al The Team Handbook, Third Edition Oriel Incorporated, 2003

(3) Brown, Brene Daring Greatly Gotham Books, 2012

Creating shared values by learning from imperfection

7/9/2014

 
Picture
“Research confirms that organizations with a strong corporate culture based on a foundation of shared values outperformed other firms by a huge margin.” (Kouzes and Posner, The Leadership Challenge, 4th Edition, 2007)

Paradoxically values do not become shared except through day-to-day acknowledgement of their on-target expression AND learning from incidents of imperfection (i.e. when actions are counter to espoused values).

Even the most skilled and committed leaders and staff will at times make mistakes relative to values. "In spite of your best intentions, you are going to get into hassles, annoy each other, and step on each other’s toes. It is an inevitable feature of work life, even in high-morale, high-performing organizations." (Kegan and Lahey How We Talk Can Change the Way We Work, 2001)

Ongoing discovery and dialogue about the day-to-day expression of values is essential. Without this, people will be more likely to remain silent or, behind the scenes, make negative judgments and complaints which just further undermine values.

A learning environment needs to be created about values. Two ways to accelerate learning:
(1) Via interpersonal feedback--For example, leaders with authority in organizations have a very powerful mpact by asking for feedback about their own actions in private and public meetings--e.g. "How are my statements and actions impacting you? Am I acting consistent with our values?"

(2) Via team check-ins and feedback--Acknowledging and learning from episodes of imperfection can be celebrated. "If people are willing to engage their own 'violations' in a spirit of personal learning (as opposed to remorse or Mao-era confession) others in the group usualy find they can also make a space that goes beyond recrimination." (Kegan and Lahey, 2001)


This kind of vulnerability is not easy. In fact, Kouzes and Posner report that of the 30 items on their leadership inventory, the lowest observed behavior of leaders is asking for feedback. (Kouzes and Posner, 2007) But, with practice, feedback about the expression of values can be done with art and skill. The benefits for everyone far outweigh the risks of personal embarrassment.

What are the odds training will transfer into the workplace?

7/8/2014

 
Picture
"Researchers have long examined the 'transfer problem'"--the extent to which learning that occurs within trainings manifests later at work leading to improved performance. Overall there appears to be a "glaring gap between training efforts and organizational outcomes." (Grossman and Salas International Journal of Training and Development 15:2, 103-120, 2011)

One review reported that "only 5 - 20% of what is learned during formal training is transferred and applied in the workplace in a way that improves performance." (The Kite Foundation An Introduction to Learning Transfer, www.kite-foundation.com, 2012)

While research findings are not definitive, the strongest and most consistent elements of training design that enhance transfer include setting goals, active learner participation and practice, opportunities for application in the workplace, follow-up, and a supportive work environment for transfer. (Grossman and Salas, 2011)

Integrating four adult learning principles into training design is likely to facilitate transfer of skills into the workplace: [synthesized below from Stolovich and Keeps Telling Ain't Training, 2012 (SK) and Knowles et al The Adult Learner, Sixth Edition, 2005 (Kn)]
(1) Readiness--Adults come to a learning situation with their own priorities and attitudes. They must see the benefits of what they are learning.(SK)
(2) Experience--Adults come into learning with a rich variety of experience which must be recognized and valued. They learn best when the learning content and activities integrate with and exploit this experience.(Kn)
(3) Autonomy--Adult learners must participate in and contribute to their learning. They need opportunity to participate through discussion, practice, and action.(SK)
(4) Action--Adult learners must see how they can credibly apply what they have learned immediately at work. (SK) They are motivated to learn to the extent they perceive the learning will help them perform tasks or deal with problems that they confront in their life situations. (Kn)

Always consider consultation before deciding

7/7/2014

 
Picture
Well-functioning work partnerships are not easy to build and maintain. They "always involve awareness, intention, and choice on an ongoing, minute-by-minute basis." (Cheesebrow, 2012)

In complex systems, there are many opportunities for misunderstandings which can disrupt partnerships.


Decision making is an especially sensitive area. In particular, making decisions unilaterally can be very negatively provocative for those who are impacted but were not involved in the decision process. Years of work building trust can be disrupted in such circumstances leading to poor quality of future problem solving and diminished engagement with implementation. (Fisher and Shapiro, 2005)

Decision making is so important for partnerships that consulting with key work partners before deciding should always be considered. In fact, while there are no absolutes and unilateral decisions are sometimes necessary, consultation is usually advisable.
(Fisher and Shapiro, 2005)

This does not mean that decision making authority is abdicated by those who have it. Even if there are negative feelings about a decision,
acknowledgement of the input along with explanation about how it was considered tends to mitigate problematic effects. Prior consultation helps others feel included. Also, valuable input may be provided.

A drawback of consulting might be prolonged decision making. But, the experience of respectful involvement usually facilitates better problem solving in the course of implementation.

Overall, "partnership is a conscious act, not a reflexive one." (Cheesebrow, 2012)

    Blog
    Subscribe
    Subscribe to receive periodic free articles and tools for subscribers only. 

    Categories

    All
    Brain Science
    Decision Making
    Dialogue
    Engagement And Motivation
    Feedback
    Meetings
    Positive Psychology
    Power
    Practice Of Leadership
    Reactivity And Reflection
    Teams
    Tools
    Vision

    Archives

    March 2020
    February 2020
    November 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    October 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    October 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    November 2015
    August 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014


    Contact Neil

Copyright Neil Baker M.D., 2021 all rights reserved
Neil Baker Consulting and Coaching
State of Washington,
Photos used under Creative Commons from blondinrikard, bertknot, ymturner, jurvetson, HikingArtist.com