Neil Baker Consulting and Coaching
Neil J. Baker M.D.
  • What
  • Why
  • Blog
  • Contact

Are flaws in decision-making processes causing conflict and poor alignment?--a quick diagnostic

2/26/2015

 
Picture
Barriers to progress like lack of alignment or conflict that are difficult to resolve are fairly common. One seemingly quite logical interpretation is that the primary cause of such barriers is the way people are communicating.

But, problematic communication could be secondary to--a result of--flaws in decision-making processes. Such flaws may not be recognized as an important source of relational problems. When people then dive into discussions, they are at risk for having unexpressed concerns, differing views, and assumptions about how decisions will be made.

As a result, it is more difficult to sustain dialogue—a process of eliciting and assuring mutual understanding of differing ideas, opinions, and perceptions. Instead, due to the prevailing uncertainties, people are more likely to fall into debates, arm-twisting, coaxing, and pressuring which disrupt efforts to achieve alignment.  

Identifying flaws in decision making and doing something about them can help significantly to shift a murky, entangled debate into a clear, effective process of dialogue.

Common decision-making errors include lack of clarity about: who has the authority to make the call; the type of decision being used; whether there will be input before and after decisions are made in order to address concerns; or if those impacted will be involved in the design of the implementation plan.

A quick diagnostic for flaws in decision making process (to support high quality dialogue):
  • In this situation, is it clear who (person or group) has the authority to make the decision?
  • Has that person or group identified the type of decision making to be used? (see brief descriptions below)
  • Is there a clear timeline for the decision?
  • Do people who are impacted and those who can contribute expertise have opportunities to give input? Have they been involved in creating a mutual definition of the problem?
  • Has there been high quality dialogue prior to the decision with consideration of different options and the benefits and risks of each?
  • Will there be opportunity to express reactions and address concerns about a decision after it is made?
  • Will people be involved in designing the implementation plan for the decision?
  • Will the person or group who made the decision engage in regular review of the quality, clarity, and effectiveness of decision making processes?

Types of decision making: (1)
The following two decision types mesh best with the objective of promoting high quality dialogue.
  • In consultative decisions, a leader with the authority to do so makes the call after obtaining input through dialogue from those who will be impacted and those who have key knowledge and expertise.
  • In consensus, a group of people make the call together. Consensus does not mean that the decision is everyone’s first choice but that everyone can live with the decision and commit fully to its success.
Additional decision types:
  • In authoritative decision making, a leader with authority makes the decision without input. Dialogue about the decision after it is made is crucial to promote alignment and participation in implementation.
  • When decisions are delegated, a leader with authority gives that authority to another leader or team who then determines the decision type and process to be used. 

Maintaining high quality dialogue while also maintaining clarity and quality of decision making processes is an important and nuanced balancing act. It takes art, skill, and ongoing, deliberate practice by individual leaders and by teams.

Additional brief articles on decision making
  • When Decisions Cause Distress--a path of courage and compassion
  • We have a consensus!?
Reference

(1) Special thanks to Robert Crosby. See his book Walking the Empowerment Tightrope 1992.


Download pdf


Comments are closed.
    Subscribe
    Subscribe to receive periodic free articles and tools for subscribers only. 

    Categories

    All
    Brain Science
    Decision Making
    Dialogue
    Engagement And Motivation
    Feedback
    Meetings
    Positive Psychology
    Power
    Practice Of Leadership
    Reactivity And Reflection
    Teams
    Tools
    Vision

    Archives

    November 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    October 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    October 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    November 2015
    August 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014


    Contact Neil

Copyright Neil Baker M.D., 2019 all rights reserved
Neil Baker Consulting and Coaching
Bainbridge Island, Washington,
Photos used under Creative Commons from bertknot, ymturner, jurvetson, HikingArtist.com